As a civilian cosmologist, I couldn’t investigate Einstein’s theorem in a formal scientific way. It would be an abuse, because I have no education nor experience to support my scientific authority. Therefore, I decided to focus on logical contradictions within the scientific achievements of Albert Einstein and Georges Lemaitre. The lack of logical consistence can be noticed and analyzed by anyone who sees it, regardless of the education such a person has. Even a child can do it. So is the privilege of amateurs, also civilian scientists, to say that the King is naked. They don’t care about scientific career; they are not dreaming about position in academic hierarchy. On this basis, in my books I revealed internal contradictions, illogical claims inside Albert Einstein’s theses, and documented that his thesis contradict other scientific statements he made. This is important for science, because Albert Einstein's scientific heritage became part of the standard model of the Universe. The Standard Model should explain how the Universe works. Unfortunately, it can’t do it. Instead, it zeroes in on meaningless details, and ignores wide view on the existing phenomena. There is a citation from a website:

„The theories and discoveries of thousands of physicists since the 1930s have resulted in a remarkable insight into the fundamental structure of matter: everything in the universe is found to be made from a few basic building blocks called fundamental particles, governed by four fundamental forces. Our best understanding of how these particles and three of the forces are related to each other is encapsulated in the Standard Model of particle physics. Developed in the early 1970s, it has successfully explained almost all experimental results and precisely predicted a wide variety of phenomena. Over time and through many experiments, the Standard Model has become established as a well-tested physics theory.” 

 

What I see above is clear manipulation; the standard model can’t explain the existing phenomena and ignores evidence. It can’t explain what happened to Antimatter, or why dinosaurs extinct, and thousands of other phenomena, but claims that “it has successfully explained almost all experimental results and precisely predicted a wide variety of phenomena.” It is not true, this is manipulation. The standard model of the Universe functioning in the mainstream of science falsely explains many phenomena, like planetary system development, or stars’ ignition process. It should not contain inner contradictions. Unfortunately, as I demonstrated in my books, the Standard Model is fundamentally false, and contains many contradictions. First, it relays on false premises proposed by Einstein, on massless photons and matter understood as a form of energy. To highlight my thesis, that the standard model is wrong, I give a few examples, presenting the internal contradictions mentioned above. More examples and detailed explanations can be found in my books, "Naked Joker" (2022), "All Against Einstein" (2023), and "New Model of the Universe" (2023).

As you know, Albert Einstein claimed that fusion energy is generated in the cores of stars. Protons join there, producing neutrons and helium atoms. Waste of fusion energy is also generated inside stars. In this case, we are dealing with fusion reaction generating fusion energy. The scientific authority of Albert Einstein is so strong that experimenters for decades followed his concepts to initiate fusion reaction in tokamaks and other devices. Meanwhile, in Einstein's famous equation e=mc2, fusion reaction transforms energy into matter, and it consumes energy to do it. According to Einstein, matter is energy, and energy can turn into matter under specific conditions. The process of transforming energy into matter can be called nuclear fusion reaction. What is important and what I emphasize is that the transformation of energy into matter do not generates energy, it consumes energy. Thanks to fusion reaction, massless energy transforms into the structure of matter, and the process of transformation could be called fusion reaction. As a result of it, the energy turns into particles of atomic structure. We see that the fusion reaction once creates fusion energy in the cores of stars, and once consumes energy to build elements of matter, as it is in Einstein’s equation or in Georges Lemaitre’s concept of the Universe origin called the Big Bang. We can see the same pattern in Lemaitre’s model, following Albert Einstein's concept of matter as a form of energy existence. In this way I proved that we have contradictions in Einstein's theorems. These contradictions are also replicated in the standard model of the universe. All experiments related to nuclear fusion reaction follow the model of matter understood as a form of energy. Despite many efforts, fusion energy cannot be released during nuclear fusion experiments. This is because, on a theoretical level, nuclear fusion cannot generate and consume energy at the same time. It would be illogical. 

 

My thesis is perfectly reflected in the scientific model of the origin of the universe proposed by Georges Lemaitre. He based his theory of the Big Bang on the concept of matter as energy, proposed by Einstein. In Lemaitre’s theory, all matter in the universe condensed down to the size of a dot at the end of a sentence, and then turned into pure, massless energy during gigantic explosion known as the Big Bang; massless energy, according to Lemaitre's model, spread in the Universe with an extraordinary speed, in just a trillionth of a second. In such a short time, the matter of the Universe turned into energy and condensed back into matter. It is hard to believe, but anyway, we’re dealing with fusion reaction at the molecular level. Fusion reaction doesn't generate energy, it consumes it, building elements of matter from energy. This supports the thesis that to Einstein fusion reaction sometimes consumed energy and sometimes generated it, according to his wishes. I think that experimenters looking for ways to control fusion energy would be very surprised to learn that Einstein believed that fusion reaction consumes energy; that would mean that fusion cannot generate energy, and their costly experiments and devices designed to release and control fusion energy are contradictory to Albert Einstein's theses. This is due to Albert Einstein himself, who probably did not notice contradictions existing in his theorem. His theses contradict each other because they are illogical.

 

Another example of the lack of logic in the standard model of the universe is related to the Big Bang theory. Lemaitre’s concept became part of the standard model. If all matter of the Universe, condensed to the size of a dot at the end of the sentence, turned into energy during the Big Bang explosion, the energy, spreading in the Universe as an immaterial phenomenon, devoid of mass, could not have kinetic energy, which only objects with mass have. Kinetic energy cannot be carried by a massless carrier. If so, the massless energy of the Big Bang could not transfer non existing kinetic energy to the matter it created because massless energy could not have kinetic energy in any way. The matter into which the energy of the Big Bang explosion was transformed in only trillionths of a second should not expand at all. This argument is ignored, and is contradicted by the evidence; for example so-called Hubble constant, or the results of measurements made by two teams of scientists in 1997, according to which the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light and constantly speeds up. In this view, the thesis about the expansion of the Universe because of the Big Bang would have no basis whatsoever, and the model called "Big Bang" would be fundamentally false; massless energy cannot transfer the kinetic energy it couldn’t possess. The Big Bang model, following the concept of matter as a form of energy, is fundamentally wrong. Thus, the concept of matter as a form of energy existence, known from the equation e=mc2, on which Lemaitre’s Big Bang was modeled, was also discredited.

Here is another example of the existence of logical contradictions in the standard model of the universe; The standard model is based on the existence of the Four Forces which are generated exclusively by matter. Matter is the source of these Four Forces, and matter could not exist without forces it generates. These are gravity, strong forces, weak forces, and electromagnetism. The existence of these forces is necessary for the functioning of matter. The strong force is responsible for the bonds within atomic structures, without it, matter would break down into its constituent elements. This concept is the basis of the standard model of the Universe, unfortunately it is illogical and therefore also self-contradictory. Here's why; if the Four Forces are generated solely by matter, as stated in the Standard Model, then during the Big Bang, which is part of the Standard Model, massless energy spread throughout the Universe, and because matter did not exist at the moment, the Four Forces could not be generated; if so, the retransformation of energy into matter should not take place at all, because matter as such did not exist and could not generate the Four Forces necessary for its own existence. To camouflage the lack of logic in the model based on Einstein's famous equation e=mc2, the transformation time of matter into energy and energy into matter during the Big Bang was shortened purposely to trillionths of a second, so that the existence of matter without the participation of the four forces was reduced to the possible minimum. In this way the supporters of the Big Bang theory probably wanted to make the impression that the four forces functioned "out of momentum" during the transformation of matter into energy and energy into matter. Such a phenomenon would not be possible at all, because logically, the absence of the forces responsible for the existence of molecular structures makes them impossible to form. You can see how the internal contradictions in the Big Bang model reveal the lack of logic in the equation proposed by Einstein, on which the Big Bang theory is based. Matter cannot be a form of energy because energy, as a form of existence of matter, would not be able to generate the Four Forces necessary for the functioning of matter in the Universe. This significant shortcoming of the concept of matter as a form of energy was somehow emphasized and compromised by Georges Lemaitre in his Big Bang concept. The concept of matter as a form of energy is like the concept of floating in the air by pulling your collar up with your hand. What I want to underline is that the transformation of matter into energy and energy into matter after the Big Bang is corrected in time by „someone”. In the past it was a few days, now is trillionth part of a second. It shows that „someone” protects false thesis intentionally, knowing they are false, and knowing that there is an „issue” related to the Four Forces in the Big Bang theory.

Similar internal contradictions also exist in other ideas of Albert Einstein, for example in his theory of time dilation, an essential part of the Theory of Relativity, which is part of the standard model. The idea of time dilation assumes that there is a relationship between the speed at which an object moves through space and the rate time passes for that object. The greater the speed of an object, the slower time flows for it. According to Einstein, if an object is traveling at the speed of light, time stops for that object. If the speed of the object was greater than the speed of light, then the time for such an object is reversed. The thesis is illogical for several reasons; first, if an object that reaches the speed of light is frozen in time, there is no way it can go faster than light, because it is frozen in time. Besides, the idea of time dilation cannot be proven at the molecular level, nor can be proven by analyzing the effects of freezing in time at the level of atomic structures. Electrons cannot stop or move in the opposite direction when the object exceeded the speed of light. Nor can matter particles "remember" their previous positions at the molecular level in any way. Stopping time would stop the process of creating the four Forces necessary for the preservation of atomic structures. This would result in the disintegration of matter into the smallest particles possible, without the possibility of recreating these structures if time started to flow again. This theory is therefore from a scientific point of view fundamentally false, in the sense that it is not even a scientific theory, but rather a kind of para-scientific construct, concerning paranormal phenomena. Based on Albert Einstein's statements, it can be concluded that for him time moves backwards very selectively for objects moving faster than the speed of light, for example people in a rocket get younger, but the rocket they fly faster than the speed of light does not change. Moreover, according to Einstein, passengers on the board would not even notice that time has stopped for them. This quasi-scientific approach to physical phenomena places the theory of time dilation in paranormal ideas, for example in the area related to the concepts of the elixir of youth. Since the concept of time dilation is part of the Theory of Relativity, and the Theory of Relativity is part of the Standard Model, it can also be said that the Theory of Relativity and the Standard Model are based on false premises and are "para-scientific". It is a great shame for modern science that such „theoretical constructs” are included in the mainstream of science. To me it is unbelievable. False premises in all the scientific heritage of Albert Einstein are photons devoid of mass, and the concept of matter as a form of energy. On these false premises, Einstein based all his scientific concepts, and unfortunately it is easy to show on the way of logical analysis that these premises are false. This is the very honest assessment that Albert Einstein and his followers received in my books. I expect my books will be prohibited because of it or destroyed in any way.

Another Einstein's statement concerns the gravity of black holes, which is supposedly so strong that „even light can’t escape from black holes”. This statement is contradicted by the existence of jets possessed by black holes, through which light escapes from black holes gravitational fields, i.e., beyond the so-called Event horizon. The presence of jets challenges several of Einstein's theories related to black holes behavior. 

 

I have discussed only a few of the logical contradictions present in the scientific work of Albert Einstein and Georges Lemaitre. There are much more of them, tons of it. 

 

In my model of the Universe, which, by contrast, I also presented in my books, photons with mass are the smallest particles of matter. I put forward the thesis that photons are not massless, as Einstein wanted. I proved it in the books "Naked Joker" (2022), "All against Einstein" (2023) and especially in "New model of the Universe" (2023). It is noteworthy that by removing mass from photons, Einstein defended all his scientific achievements based on this assumption; for example, if photons had mass, they would have to be frozen in time, because of Einstein’s restrictions related to material objects moving at the speed of light, predicted by Albert Einstein in his idea of "time dilation”. The evidence from 1997, proving that the Universe expands faster than light, is consequently ignored by physicists and astrophysicists. They zero in on meaningless details and ignore the evidence crucial to understanding how the Universe works. There is another citation:

 

„So although the Standard Model accurately describes the phenomena within its domain, it is still incomplete. Perhaps it is only a part of a bigger picture that includes new physics hidden deep in the subatomic world or in the dark recesses of the universe. New information from experiments at the LHC will help us to find more of these missing pieces.”

I answered all these “unanswered” questions. All unsolved problems, not explained by the standard model, like what happened to Antimatter, or what caused dinosaurs’ extinction are answered in my books. Phenomena wrongly explained by the standard model are explained by my model of the Universe. The best example of such a wrong explanation would be location of fusion reaction as a source of fusion energy in the cores of stars. Inside stars are nuclei made of metallic Hydrogen, it was proved during experiments in NIF 2018; conditions necessary to make Hydrogen metallic exist inside stars. The explanation proposed by the standard model is wrong. I can’t overcome ignorance of Einstein’s followers, claiming they are scientists. It’s obvious, that the mainstream is not interested in any changes in science, and won’t allow to any changes, if they won’t follow Einstein’s illogical theoretical constructs. We are subject of mass manipulation, and the reason for that is to secure Einstein’s false authority, and by doing it, protect dominant position in science to Einstein’s followers. To overcome the ignorance of scientific elites, we must propagate new model of the Universe I proved in a logical way, using evidence existing in Nature. The source of energy in the universe in my model is a structure created by photons, which I call the megastructure or the grid, like the concept of Dark Matter, generating Dark energy. The difference is that in my model, the components of the megastructure are photons that have mass. Particles of "Dark Matter" do not exist, and the search for them from the perspective of my model is doomed to failure. What is called "Dark Matter" is the megastructure, created under the right conditions by photons that have mass. The mass of the megastructure is about 80-90% of the mass of the Universe. It is everywhere inside the Universe. It expands outside of the Universe because the volume of it is constantly increasing. It is created by stars, and some other celestial bodies. The substantial part of solar wind is the megastructure. It is also created in large volume at the edges of the Universe. I proved the megastructure’s existence in my books. Please, read them all! The next are in a progress. I have some new ideas related to interference of light, and some other ideas, not explored yet.

 

 

Mieczyslaw Jerzy Herba.